Cross‑Country Hit Plot Targeted Mega-Star

Red text stating the word shocking
Photo: Shutterstock

A Los Angeles grand jury says a Florida woman drove across the country to kill Rihanna, then opened fire on a nursery where the singer’s children slept.

Quick Take

  • Ivanna Lisette Ortiz, 36, of Orlando, faces a 14-count indictment including attempted murder after a March shooting at Rihanna’s Los Angeles home.
  • Prosecutors say bullets struck a trailer holding Rihanna and A$AP Rocky and a nursery where their young children were staying.
  • Ortiz pleaded not guilty and told investigators after her arrest, “I wasn’t attempting murder.”
  • A judge already ruled Ortiz mentally competent to stand trial on the full set of charges.

What The Indictment Actually Charges

The Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office unsealed the indictment on September 30, charging Ortiz with one count of attempted murder, 10 felony counts of assault with an assault weapon, and three felony counts of shooting at an inhabited dwelling or camper.

The grand jury had actually returned the indictment back in June, but it stayed sealed until this fall. That is 14 separate felony counts stemming from a single burst of gunfire outside one Beverly Crest mansion.

Prosecutors say Ortiz fired a semiautomatic rifle at the home while Rihanna, her husband A$AP Rocky, and their three young children were inside. Deputy District Attorney Alexander Bott told reporters the case centers on one clear target.

“This is a person who wanted to kill Rihanna. Everyone else was collateral damage,” Bott said, describing a shooter who allegedly traveled from Florida with that single goal in mind.

Why Prosecutors Stack So Many Separate Counts

Shooting cases like this one almost always carry multiple charges layered on top of each other. Attempted murder is the hardest count to prove in court because it requires showing specific intent to kill, not just reckless or dangerous behavior.

Shooting-at-a-dwelling and assault-with-a-weapon counts are easier to prove from the physical evidence alone, which is why California prosecutors routinely file them together in serious gun cases.

That legal strategy explains the sheer size of this indictment. Ten separate assault counts likely correspond to the number of people prosecutors say were endangered inside the home, while the dwelling counts cover the structures actually hit by gunfire.

None of that changes the core allegation. It simply gives a jury several paths to conviction if intent to kill proves difficult to establish beyond doubt.

Ortiz’s Own Words Complicate The Picture

A police report made public after her arrest quotes Ortiz directly addressing the most serious charge against her. “I would like to say that I wasn’t attempting murder.

But that’s all I wanted to say,” she told detectives, according to multiple outlets that reviewed the report. It is a brief denial, not an explanation of what she claims actually happened that day.

Ortiz pleaded not guilty in March to the original charges and again after the indictment was unsealed in September. A judge later found her mentally competent to stand trial, clearing the path toward a full trial on all 14 counts. Competency findings do not resolve guilt. They only confirm a defendant can understand the proceedings against her.

What stands out here is how little daylight exists between the prosecution’s narrative and the public record so far. Ortiz’s own statement is a denial of intent, not a competing account of events.

Until her defense presents an actual alternative version at trial, the facts on the table point in one direction: a cross-country trip, a loaded rifle, and gunfire landing near sleeping children.

Sources:

da.lacounty.gov, nbclosangeles.com, apnews.com, latimes.com, wsbtv.com