
The Supreme Court has now told President Donald Trump twice that his fight to erase a $5 million jury verdict is over.
Quick Take
- The Supreme Court refused to hear Trump’s appeal of the $5 million verdict, then refused again when he asked for a do-over.
- A 2023 jury found Trump sexually abused writer E. Jean Carroll and defamed her, awarding her $5 million.
- The Second Circuit Court of Appeals already upheld the verdict, finding no legal mistakes in the trial.
- Trump has always denied the claims, calling the case a “hoax” and, most recently, a “Fake Case.”
- A separate, larger $83.3 million defamation verdict against Trump is still working through the appeals process.
Two Rejections, One Unmoved Verdict
The Supreme Court denied Trump’s appeal on June 29, 2026, with no explanation and no noted dissents. That left the $5 million judgment standing exactly as the jury wrote it. Trump’s team then asked the Court to reconsider that denial.
The justices said no a second time, again without giving reasons, according to reporting from ABC News and other outlets covering the case.
Legal experts note that Supreme Court denials like this do not amount to an endorsement of the lower court’s reasoning. The Court simply chooses not to weigh in, and the earlier ruling stands as final. For Trump, though, the practical result is identical to a loss: the $5 million verdict is locked in place with no further path for appeal.
What the Jury Actually Found
A Manhattan jury reached its verdict in 2023 after hearing Carroll testify that Trump attacked her in a department store dressing room in the mid-1990s.
Jurors found Trump liable for sexual abuse, though they stopped short of finding rape under the specific legal definition used at trial. They also found he defamed her with a 2022 Truth Social post calling her allegations a “hoax”.
That Truth Social post is the heart of the defamation claim. In it, Trump wrote that Carroll’s story was fake and added that she “is not my type.”
The jury decided that statement crossed the line from opinion into defamation, and it tied the $5 million award to both the abuse finding and the defamatory post.
Appeals Court Found No Errors
Before the case ever reached the Supreme Court, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the trial record closely. In a 2024 opinion, the appellate judges ruled the trial judge had not made reversible mistakes.
They specifically upheld the decision to let jurors hear evidence of Trump’s past conduct toward other women, a type of evidence normally restricted but allowed under specific federal rules in sexual misconduct cases.
Trump’s Response: Denial and Defiance
Trump has never wavered from denying the allegations. In his 2022 deposition, played for the jury, he said flatly, “It didn’t happen,” and dismissed the entire case as a hoax.
After the Supreme Court’s latest rejection, he took to Truth Social to call it a “Fake Case brought against me,” framing the outcome as unjust rather than accepting the legal finality of it.
Trump’s lawyers have also argued the trial judge let in evidence that unfairly swayed the jury against him, a claim the Second Circuit already considered and rejected.
Given that two levels of courts, a jury and an appeals panel, reached the same conclusion using the actual trial record, the “unfair evidence” argument carries far less weight than blanket claims of persecution suggest.
A Bigger Legal Fight Still Ahead
This $5 million case is separate from a much larger $83.3 million defamation verdict Carroll won against Trump over statements he made in 2019 while in office.
Trump is still appealing that judgment, and his lawyers are leaning on presidential immunity, arguing his 2019 denials counted as official government communications protected from lawsuits. The two cases are often mentioned together, which can confuse what has actually been decided in each.
BREAKING: The U.S. Supreme Court has REJECTED Trump’s renewed request to hear his appeal of the $5 MILLION verdict in favor of E. Jean Carroll.
The nation’s highest court has once again refused to intervene.
Trump loses again. pic.twitter.com/mehd5WzNzK
— Darline Graham Q🇺🇸 (@DarlinGrahamSC) August 18, 2026
Whatever happens with the larger appeal, the $5 million verdict is no longer in dispute. Every court that reviewed the trial record, from the jury box to the Second Circuit to the Supreme Court’s silence, left the finding untouched.
That is a significant fact for readers weighing accountability against claims of political targeting, and it deserves clear-eyed attention rather than getting lost in the noise of the bigger dollar figure still in court.
Sources:
apnews.com, abcnews.com, theguardian.com, cnbc.com, scotusblog.com, en.wikipedia.org, reuters.com













